Cypress Bluetooth Mesh SDK BSA0107_05.01.00-BX8-AMESH-08 pb_transport_handle_frag_ buffer overflow
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Cypress Bluetooth Mesh SDK BSA0107_05.01.00-BX8-AMESH-08. This affects the function pb_transport_handle_frag_. This manipulation causes buffer overflow.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2022-31363. The attack is only possible within the local network. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Cypress Bluetooth Mesh SDK BSA0107_05.01.00-BX8-AMESH-08. Affected by this vulnerability is the function pb_transport_handle_frag_. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a buffer overflow vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-120. The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cypress : https://www.infineon.com/ Cypress Bluetooth Mesh SDK BSA0107_05.01.00-BX8-AMESH-08 is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: execute arbitrary code (remote). The component is: affected function is pb_transport_handle_frag_. ¶¶ In Cypress Bluetooth Mesh SDK, there is an out-of-bound write vulnerability that can be triggered during mesh provisioning. Because there is no check for mismatched SegN and TotalLength in Transaction Start PDU.
The weakness was disclosed 02/02/2023. The advisory is shared at docs.google.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2022-31363 since 05/23/2022. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.2
CNA Vector (MITRE): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Buffer overflowCWE: CWE-120 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/23/2022 🔍02/02/2023 🔍
02/02/2023 🔍
03/28/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: docs.google.comStatus: Not defined
CNA: MITRE
CVE: CVE-2022-31363 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-31363
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-219997
Entry
Created: 02/02/2023 08:19Updated: 03/28/2025 00:09
Changes: 02/02/2023 08:19 (48), 03/28/2025 00:09 (26)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.