Wicked Folders Plugin up to 2.18.16 on WordPress ajax_unassign_folders cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Wicked Folders Plugin up to 2.18.16 on WordPress. Impacted is the function ajax_unassign_folders. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery.
This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2023-0685. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Wicked Folders Plugin up to 2.18.16 on WordPress (WordPress Plugin). This affects the function ajax_unassign_folders. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The Wicked Folders plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.18.16. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_unassign_folders function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke this function via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link leading them to perform actions intended for administrators such as changing the folder structure maintained by the plugin..
The weakness was released 02/08/2023. The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2023-0685 since 02/06/2023. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 2.18.0
- 2.18.1
- 2.18.2
- 2.18.3
- 2.18.4
- 2.18.5
- 2.18.6
- 2.18.7
- 2.18.8
- 2.18.9
- 2.18.10
- 2.18.11
- 2.18.12
- 2.18.13
- 2.18.14
- 2.18.15
- 2.18.16
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.3
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.4
CNA Vector (Wordfence): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/06/2023 🔍02/08/2023 🔍
02/08/2023 🔍
03/06/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-0685 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-0685
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-220401
Entry
Created: 02/08/2023 08:34Updated: 03/06/2023 14:56
Changes: 02/08/2023 08:34 (49), 03/06/2023 14:56 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.