Search in Place Plugin up to 1.0.104 on WordPress Feedback Submission cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Search in Place Plugin up to 1.0.104 on WordPress. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Feedback Submission. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2023-26521. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Search in Place Plugin up to 1.0.104 on WordPress (WordPress Plugin) and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component Feedback Submission. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Missing Authorization vulnerability in CodePeople Search in Place allows Functionality Misuse.This issue affects Search in Place: from n/a through 1.0.104.
The weakness was disclosed 03/03/2023. The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-26521 since 02/24/2023. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.3
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/24/2023 🔍03/03/2023 🔍
03/03/2023 🔍
04/27/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-26521 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-26521
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-222277
Entry
Created: 03/03/2023 16:14Updated: 04/27/2025 20:24
Changes: 03/03/2023 16:14 (38), 06/04/2024 00:30 (24), 06/04/2024 14:17 (1), 04/27/2025 20:24 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.