Chengdu VEC40G 3.0 Network Detection send_order.cgi?parameter=access_detect Count os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Chengdu VEC40G 3.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /send_order.cgi?parameter=access_detect of the component Network Detection. This manipulation of the argument Count with the input 3 | netstat -an causes os command injection.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2023-2522. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available.
The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Chengdu VEC40G 3.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the file /send_order.cgi?parameter=access_detect of the component Network Detection. The manipulation of the argument COUNT with the input value 3 | netstat -an leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was presented 05/04/2023. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-2522. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 4.7
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.2
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.7
CNA Vector (VulDB): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/04/2023 🔍05/04/2023 🔍
05/04/2023 🔍
05/27/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-2522 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-2522
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-228013
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 05/04/2023 18:14Updated: 05/27/2023 15:41
Changes: 05/04/2023 18:14 (44), 05/27/2023 15:34 (2), 05/27/2023 15:41 (28)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: eckert-lcc
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #147634: Flying Star enterprise intelligent online behavior management system VEC40G- Remote command execution vulnerability (by eckert-lcc)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.