| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Cesanta MJS 1.26. Affected by this issue is the function mjs_execute of the file mjs.c. This manipulation causes denial of service.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2023-30088. The attack requires local access. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Cesanta MJS 1.26. Affected by this vulnerability is the function mjs_execute of the file mjs.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue found in Cesanta MJS v.1.26 allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via the mjs_execute function in mjs.c.
The weakness was presented 05/09/2023 as 243. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-30088 since 04/07/2023. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2023-34521). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Product: https://github.com/cesanta/mjs/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/07/2023 🔍05/09/2023 🔍
05/09/2023 🔍
12/20/2025 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: 243
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2023-30088 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-30088
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-228493
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/09/2023 20:53Updated: 12/20/2025 04:58
Changes: 05/09/2023 20:53 (40), 06/01/2023 17:20 (11), 12/20/2025 04:58 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.