fossbilling up to 0.4.x logic error

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.7$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in fossbilling up to 0.4.x. This impacts an unknown function. The manipulation leads to logic error. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2023-3229. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in fossbilling up to 0.4.x (Billing Software). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a logic error vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-840. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Business Logic Errors in GitHub repository fossbilling/fossbilling prior to 0.5.0.

The weakness was published 06/14/2023. It is possible to read the advisory at huntr.dev. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2023-3229 since 06/14/2023. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.

Upgrading to version 0.5.0 eliminates this vulnerability. Applying the patch 56a64fefddf6a0b06304bdd443fdb0bb55423533 is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be upgrading to the latest version.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2023-43905). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 5.4
CNA Vector (huntr.dev): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Logic error
CWE: CWE-840
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: fossbilling 0.5.0
Patch: 56a64fefddf6a0b06304bdd443fdb0bb55423533

Timelineinfo

06/14/2023 🔍
06/14/2023 +0 days 🔍
06/14/2023 +0 days 🔍
01/26/2026 +957 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Product: github.com

Advisory: 56a64fefddf6a0b06304bdd443fdb0bb55423533
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2023-3229 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-3229
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-231515
EUVD: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 06/14/2023 09:21
Updated: 01/26/2026 19:40
Changes: 06/14/2023 09:21 (50), 07/13/2023 10:17 (1), 01/26/2026 19:40 (15)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!