| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP Server 2.0. It has been rated as critical. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2004-2366. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP Server 2.0 (File Transfer Software) and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP Server 2.0 B03.11.2004.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a SITE command with a long argument.
The weakness was released 12/31/2004 by SecuriTeam with SecuriTeam.com (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2004-2366 since 08/16/2005. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
A public exploit has been developed in Perl. The exploit is available at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (15511), Exploit-DB (23839), SecurityFocus (BID 9904†) and Secunia (SA11159†). Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-25038. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/17/2004 🔍03/18/2004 🔍
12/31/2004 🔍
12/31/2004 🔍
08/16/2005 🔍
03/09/2015 🔍
07/14/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: SecuriTeam
Organization: SecuriTeam.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2004-2366 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2004-2366
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-23261
X-Force: 15511
SecurityFocus: 9904 - GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP Server SITE Command Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Secunia: 11159 - GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP Server "SITE" Command Vulnerability, Moderately Critical
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/09/2015 16:19Updated: 07/14/2025 02:00
Changes: 03/09/2015 16:19 (60), 03/25/2019 21:40 (3), 07/14/2025 02:00 (21)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:B0C:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.