Sensormatic VideoEdge prior 6.1.1 Configuration File acceptance of extraneous untrusted data with trusted data

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.9$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Sensormatic VideoEdge. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the component Configuration File Handler. This manipulation causes acceptance of extraneous untrusted data with trusted data. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2023-3749. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Sensormatic VideoEdge and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the component Configuration File Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a acceptance of extraneous untrusted data with trusted data vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-349. The product, when processing trusted data, accepts any untrusted data that is also included with the trusted data, treating the untrusted data as if it were trusted. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The weakness was released 08/03/2023 as icsa-23-215-04. The advisory is shared at cisa.gov. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-3749. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

Upgrading to version 6.1.1 eliminates this vulnerability.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.0
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9

VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 7.1
CNA Vector (Johnson Controls): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Acceptance of extraneous untrusted data with trusted data
CWE: CWE-349
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: VideoEdge 6.1.1

Timelineinfo

07/18/2023 🔍
08/03/2023 +16 days 🔍
08/03/2023 +0 days 🔍
08/26/2023 +23 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: icsa-23-215-04
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2023-3749 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-3749
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-236101

Entryinfo

Created: 08/03/2023 22:32
Updated: 08/26/2023 12:32
Changes: 08/03/2023 22:32 (37), 08/26/2023 12:25 (1), 08/26/2023 12:32 (21)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!