Easy!Appointments up to 1.3.1 on WordPress disconnect denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Easy!Appointments up to 1.3.1 on WordPress. This affects the function disconnect. This manipulation causes denial of service.
This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2023-32295. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Easy!Appointments up to 1.3.1 on WordPress (WordPress Plugin). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function disconnect. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Alex Tselegidis Easy!Appointments.This issue affects Easy!Appointments: from n/a through 1.3.3.
The weakness was published 08/14/2023. The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-32295 since 05/08/2023. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.3
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/08/2023 🔍08/14/2023 🔍
08/14/2023 🔍
07/11/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-32295 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-32295
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-237085
Entry
Created: 08/14/2023 18:09Updated: 07/11/2024 17:58
Changes: 08/14/2023 18:09 (38), 07/11/2024 17:58 (27)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.