Byzoro Smart S85F Management Platform up to 20230807 /log/decodmail.php File command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Byzoro Smart S85F Management Platform up to 20230807. It has been rated as critical. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /log/decodmail.php. This manipulation of the argument File causes command injection. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2023-4414. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Byzoro Smart S85F Management Platform up to 20230807. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the file /log/decodmail.php. The manipulation of the argument file with an unknown input leads to a command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-77. The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was disclosed 08/18/2023. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-4414. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. By approaching the search of inurl:log/decodmail.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.3
CNA Vector (VulDB): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Command injectionCWE: CWE-77 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/18/2023 🔍08/18/2023 🔍
08/18/2023 🔍
04/09/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-4414 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-4414
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-237517
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 08/18/2023 10:21Updated: 04/09/2024 09:06
Changes: 08/18/2023 10:21 (42), 09/13/2023 14:27 (2), 09/13/2023 14:31 (28), 04/09/2024 09:06 (15)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: RCEraser
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #191743: The Smart S85F management platform has an rce vulnerability (by RCEraser)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.