Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories SEL-5036 acSELerator Bay Screen Builder Software prior 1.0.49152.778 on Windows path traversal
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories SEL-5036 acSELerator Bay Screen Builder Software on Windows. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Performing a manipulation results in path traversal. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2023-31167. The attack is only possible with local access. There is not any exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories SEL-5036 acSELerator Bay Screen Builder Software on Windows. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-23. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize sequences such as ".." that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory. This is going to have an impact on integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories SEL-5036 acSELerator Bay Screen Builder Software on Windows allows Relative Path Traversal. SEL acSELerator Bay Screen Builder software is distributed by SEL-5033 SEL acSELerator RTAC, SEL-5030 Quickset, and SEL Compass. CVE-2023-31167 and was patched in the acSELerator Bay Screen Builder release available on 20230602. Please contact SEL for additional details. This issue affects SEL-5036 acSELerator Bay Screen Builder Software: before 1.0.49152.778.
The weakness was released 08/31/2023. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2023-31167 since 04/24/2023. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 1.0.49152.778 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Base Score: 3.9
VulDB Temp Score: 3.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.0
CNA Vector (Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-23 / CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: SEL-5036 acSELerator Bay Screen Builder Software 1.0.49152.778
Timeline
04/24/2023 🔍08/31/2023 🔍
08/31/2023 🔍
09/27/2023 🔍
Sources
Status: ConfirmedCVE: CVE-2023-31167 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-31167
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-238461
Entry
Created: 08/31/2023 19:37Updated: 09/27/2023 14:32
Changes: 08/31/2023 19:37 (47), 09/27/2023 14:32 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.