SuSE Linux 1.0/8.1/8.2/9.0/9.1 tif_ojpeg.c ojpegvsetfield heap-based overflow
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in SuSE Linux 1.0/8.1/8.2/9.0/9.1. It has been rated as critical. Affected is the function ojpegvsetfield of the file tif_ojpeg.c. The manipulation leads to heap-based overflow.
This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2004-0929. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in SuSE Linux 1.0/8.1/8.2/9.0/9.1 (Operating System) and classified as very critical. This issue affects the function ojpegvsetfield of the file tif_ojpeg.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a heap-based overflow vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-122. A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc(). Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Heap-based buffer overflow in the OJPEGVSetField function in tif_ojpeg.c for libtiff 3.6.1 and earlier, when compiled with the OJPEG_SUPPORT (old JPEG support) option, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed TIFF image.
The bug was discovered 10/22/2004. The weakness was released 01/27/2005 by Andrei Nigmatulin as confirmed advisory (CERT.org). It is possible to read the advisory at kb.cert.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2004-0929 since 10/04/2004. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/21/2024).
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 15552 (SUSE-SA:2004:038: libtiff), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family SuSE Local Security Checks.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (17843), Tenable (15552), SecurityFocus (BID 11506†), OSVDB (11147†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-7525†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.suse.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Heap-based overflowCWE: CWE-122 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 15552
Nessus Name: SUSE-SA:2004:038: libtiff
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 65096
OpenVAS Name: SLES9: Security update for libtiff
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/04/2004 🔍10/22/2004 🔍
10/22/2004 🔍
10/22/2004 🔍
10/22/2004 🔍
01/27/2005 🔍
01/27/2005 🔍
04/10/2005 🔍
03/10/2015 🔍
11/21/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: suse.comAdvisory: kb.cert.org
Researcher: Andrei Nigmatulin
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2004-0929 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2004-0929
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-23891
CERT: 🔍
X-Force: 17843
SecurityFocus: 11506 - LibTIFF OJPEG Heap Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
OSVDB: 11147 - CVE-2004-0929 - LibtTIFF - Buffer Overflow Issue
Vulnerability Center: 7525 - Buffer Overflow in LibTIFF 3.6.1 via OJPEGVSetField Function, Medium
Entry
Created: 03/10/2015 15:27Updated: 11/21/2024 01:39
Changes: 03/10/2015 15:27 (68), 05/31/2019 10:21 (6), 11/21/2024 01:39 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:F34:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.