Netis N3Mv2 1.0.1.865 Input pingWdogIp denial of service

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.4$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Netis N3Mv2 1.0.1.865. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Input Handler. This manipulation of the argument pingWdogIp causes denial of service. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2023-45468. No exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Netis N3Mv2 1.0.1.865. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the component Input Handler. The manipulation of the argument pingWdogIp with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:

Netis N3Mv2-V1.0.1.865 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the pingWdogIp. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.

The weakness was published 10/13/2023. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-45468 since 10/09/2023. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2023-49760). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4

VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Denial of service
CWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

10/09/2023 🔍
10/13/2023 +4 days 🔍
10/13/2023 +0 days 🔍
02/10/2026 +851 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: github.com
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2023-45468 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-45468
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-242125
EUVD: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 10/13/2023 18:29
Updated: 02/10/2026 08:21
Changes: 10/13/2023 18:29 (39), 11/02/2023 08:56 (11), 02/10/2026 08:21 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!