| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Armagetron 0.2.6.0/0.2.7.0. This impacts an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2005-0369. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Armagetron 0.2.6.0/0.2.7.0. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
Armagetron 0.2.6.0 and earlier and Armagetron Advanced 0.2.7.0 earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a packet with a large (1) descriptor ID or (2) claim_id, which exceeds the boundaries of an array.
The weakness was shared 02/10/2005 as confirmed posting (Bugtraq). The advisory is shared at marc.theaimsgroup.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2005-0369 since 02/11/2005. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
A public exploit has been developed by Luigi Auriemma and been published immediately after the advisory. The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (810), OSVDB (13723†) and Secunia (SA14234†). The entries VDB-24431 and VDB-24430 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.3
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: Luigi Auriemma
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/10/2005 🔍02/10/2005 🔍
02/10/2005 🔍
02/11/2005 🔍
02/11/2005 🔍
02/11/2005 🔍
05/02/2005 🔍
03/10/2015 🔍
01/16/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: marc.theaimsgroup.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2005-0369 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-0369
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-24429
Secunia: 14234 - Armagetron Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 13723 - Armagetron Large Descriptor ID DoS
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/10/2015 23:05Updated: 01/16/2025 20:36
Changes: 03/10/2015 23:05 (45), 07/06/2018 08:40 (15), 01/16/2025 20:36 (26)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.