| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in MaxWebPortal 1.33. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file links_add_form.asp. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-1016. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in MaxWebPortal 1.33. This affects an unknown functionality of the file links_add_form.asp. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in links_add_form.asp for MaxWebPortal 1.33 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a Javascript URL in a banner URL.
The bug was discovered 03/31/2005. The weakness was published 05/02/2005 by Zinho (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at secunia.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2005-1016 since 04/08/2005. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 2 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. By approaching the search of inurl:links_add_form.asp it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 17688 (MaxWebPortal <= 1.33 Multiple Vulnerabilities), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CGI abuses and running in the context r.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (19929), Tenable (17688), SecurityFocus (BID 12968†), OSVDB (15196†) and Secunia (SA14752†). Similar entries are available at VDB-24796 and VDB-25040. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 17688
Nessus Name: MaxWebPortal <= 1.33 Multiple Vulnerabilities
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/31/2005 🔍03/31/2005 🔍
03/31/2005 🔍
04/01/2005 🔍
04/02/2005 🔍
04/04/2005 🔍
04/04/2005 🔍
04/08/2005 🔍
05/02/2005 🔍
05/02/2005 🔍
03/10/2015 🔍
05/31/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: secunia.com⛔Researcher: Zinho
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2005-1016 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-1016
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-24795
X-Force: 19929
SecurityFocus: 12968 - MaxWebPortal Events And Links Interface Multiple Input Validation Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 14752 - MaxWebPortal SQL Injection and Script Insertion Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 15196 - CVE-2005-1016 - MaxWebPortal - Cross-Site Scripting Issue
SecurityTracker: 1013617
Vulnerability Center: 7501 - XSS in MaxWebPortal 1.33 via links_add_form.asp, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/10/2015 23:05Updated: 05/31/2019 09:53
Changes: 03/10/2015 23:05 (73), 05/31/2019 09:53 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.