codelyfe Stupid Simple CMS up to 1.2.3 HTTP POST Request handle-command.php command os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in codelyfe Stupid Simple CMS up to 1.2.3. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /terminal/handle-command.php of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument command with the input whoami results in os command injection.
This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2023-6901. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in codelyfe Stupid Simple CMS up to 1.2.3 (Content Management System). This affects an unknown code of the file /terminal/handle-command.php of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument command with the input value whoami leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was shared 12/16/2023. It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2023-6901. Technical details and a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1202 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The exploit is shared for download at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:terminal/handle-command.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.9
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.3
CNA Vector (VulDB): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/16/2023 🔍12/16/2023 🔍
12/16/2023 🔍
01/11/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-6901 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-6901
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-248259
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 12/16/2023 20:48Updated: 01/11/2024 21:51
Changes: 12/16/2023 20:48 (44), 01/11/2024 21:38 (2), 01/11/2024 21:51 (28)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: ggbot
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #251764: Stupid-Simple-CMS Stupid-Simple-CMS <=1.2.3 Unauthorized remote command execution (by ggbot)
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.