| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in SpliceCom iPCS and iPCS2. The affected element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in certificate validation. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2023-33757. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SpliceCom iPCS and iPCS2 (version now known). This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a certificate validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-295. The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A lack of SSL certificate validation in Splicecom iPCS (iOS App) v1.3.4, iPCS2 (iOS App) v2.8 and before, and iPCS (Android App) v1.8.5 and before allows attackers to eavesdrop on communications via a man-in-the-middle attack.
The weakness was disclosed 01/25/2024. It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2023-33757 since 05/22/2023. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1587.003 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2023-37909). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.9
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate validationCWE: CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/22/2023 🔍01/25/2024 🔍
01/25/2024 🔍
06/21/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-33757 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-33757
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-252027
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/25/2024 09:19Updated: 06/21/2025 04:25
Changes: 01/25/2024 09:19 (36), 02/18/2024 13:07 (11), 06/21/2025 04:25 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.