Buffalo LS210D 1.78-0.03 Ping Utility os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Buffalo LS210D 1.78-0.03 and classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component Ping Utility. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2023-49038. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Buffalo LS210D 1.78-0.03. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the component Ping Utility. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Command injection in the ping utility on Buffalo LS210D 1.78-0.03 allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary commands onto the NAS as root.
The weakness was shared 01/29/2024. It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2023-49038 since 11/20/2023. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 06/03/2025). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1202 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2023-53062). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.9
VulDB Base Score: 8.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.2
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/20/2023 🔍01/29/2024 🔍
01/29/2024 🔍
06/03/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-49038 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-49038
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-252339
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/29/2024 22:50Updated: 06/03/2025 00:36
Changes: 01/29/2024 22:50 (38), 02/21/2024 18:08 (11), 06/02/2025 22:30 (16), 06/03/2025 00:36 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.