WPvivid Backup and Migration Plugin up to 0.9.68 on WordPress authorization

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in WPvivid Backup and Migration Plugin up to 0.9.68 on WordPress. This impacts an unknown function. This manipulation causes authorization. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2024-1982. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in WPvivid Backup and Migration Plugin up to 0.9.68 on WordPress (Backup Software). Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-862. The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

The Migration, Backup, Staging – WPvivid plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on the get_restore_progress() and restore() functions in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.68. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to exploit a SQL injection vulnerability or trigger a DoS.

The weakness was disclosed 02/28/2024. It is possible to read the advisory at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-1982 since 02/28/2024. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/12/2026).

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

• Backup Software

Name

• WPvivid Backup and Migration Plugin

Version

• 0.9.0
• 0.9.1
• 0.9.2
• 0.9.3
• 0.9.4
• 0.9.5
• 0.9.6
• 0.9.7
• 0.9.8
• 0.9.9
• 0.9.10
• 0.9.11
• 0.9.12
• 0.9.13
• 0.9.14
• 0.9.15
• 0.9.16
• 0.9.17
• 0.9.18
• 0.9.19
• 0.9.20
• 0.9.21
• 0.9.22
• 0.9.23
• 0.9.24
• 0.9.25
• 0.9.26
• 0.9.27
• 0.9.28
• 0.9.29
• 0.9.30
• 0.9.31
• 0.9.32
• 0.9.33
• 0.9.34
• 0.9.35
• 0.9.36
• 0.9.37
• 0.9.38
• 0.9.39
• 0.9.40
• 0.9.41
• 0.9.42
• 0.9.43
• 0.9.44
• 0.9.45
• 0.9.46
• 0.9.47
• 0.9.48
• 0.9.49
• 0.9.50
• 0.9.51
• 0.9.52
• 0.9.53
• 0.9.54
• 0.9.55
• 0.9.56
• 0.9.57
• 0.9.58
• 0.9.59
• 0.9.60
• 0.9.61
• 0.9.62
• 0.9.63
• 0.9.64
• 0.9.65
• 0.9.66
• 0.9.67
• 0.9.68

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion