Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q/MELSEC-L Packet incorrect pointer scaling

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
9.7$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as very critical has been reported in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q and MELSEC-L. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Packet Handler. The manipulation leads to incorrect pointer scaling. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2024-1915. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. It is recommended to apply restrictive firewalling.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q and MELSEC-L (the affected version is unknown) and classified as very critical. This issue affects an unknown code of the component Packet Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a incorrect pointer scaling vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-468. In C and C++, one may often accidentally refer to the wrong memory due to the semantics of when math operations are implicitly scaled. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

It is possible to read the advisory at cisa.gov. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-1915. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/15/2024).

Addressing this vulnerability is possible by firewalling .

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.7

VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector (Mitsubishi Electric Corporation): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Incorrect pointer scaling
CWE: CWE-468
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Firewall
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

02/27/2024 🔍
03/15/2024 +17 days 🔍
03/15/2024 +0 days 🔍
04/15/2024 +31 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: icsa-24-074-14
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2024-1915 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-1915
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-256883

Entryinfo

Created: 03/15/2024 01:08
Updated: 04/15/2024 15:43
Changes: 03/15/2024 01:08 (36), 04/15/2024 15:37 (16), 04/15/2024 15:43 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Want to stay up to date on a daily basis?

Enable the mail alert feature now!