FastDDS v2.12.x, 2.6.x/2.10.x/2.11.x/2.12.x HistoryQosPolicy denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in FastDDS v2.12.x, 2.6.x/2.10.x/2.11.x/2.12.x. This affects an unknown part of the component HistoryQosPolicy. The manipulation leads to denial of service. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-26369. No exploit exists. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Details
A vulnerability was found in FastDDS v2.12.x, 2.6.x/2.10.x/2.11.x/2.12.x. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component HistoryQosPolicy. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue in the HistoryQosPolicy component of FastDDS v2.12.x, v2.11.x, v2.10.x, and v2.6.x leads to a SIGABRT (signal abort) upon receiving DataWriter's data.
The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-26369 since 02/19/2024. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Patch: github.com
Timeline
02/19/2024 🔍03/19/2024 🔍
03/19/2024 🔍
03/19/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: 4365Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2024-26369 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-26369
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-257237
Entry
Created: 03/19/2024 07:40Changes: 03/19/2024 07:40 (54)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.