Apache HTTP Server up to 2.4.58 response splitting

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Apache HTTP Server up to 2.4.58 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. This manipulation causes response splitting. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2023-38709. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. The affected component should be upgraded.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Apache HTTP Server up to 2.4.58. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a response splitting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-113. The product receives data from an HTTP agent/component (e.g., web server, proxy, browser, etc.), but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CR and LF characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:

Faulty input validation in the core of Apache allows malicious or exploitable backend/content generators to split HTTP responses. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: through 2.4.58.

The advisory is shared at seclists.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-38709 since 07/24/2023. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 05/05/2026).

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 207702 (RHEL 7 / 8 : Red Hat JBoss Core Services Apache HTTP Server 2.4.57 SP6 (RHSA-2024:6927)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.

Upgrading to version 2.4.67 eliminates this vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (207702) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2024-1504). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Affected

• Debian Linux
• IBM Tivoli Monitoring
• Amazon Linux 2
• Red Hat Enterprise Linux
• Fedora Linux
• Ubuntu Linux
• F5 BIG-IP
• SUSE Linux
• IBM HTTP Server
• Oracle Linux
• Xerox FreeFlow Print Server
• Gentoo Linux
• Hitachi Ops Center
• IBM Business Automation Workflow
• Hitachi Configuration Manager
• RESF Rocky Linux
• IBM Rational ClearQuest
• Dell PowerScale OneFS
• Apache HTTP Server
• Dell NetWorker
• IBM Rational Build Forge
• HCL Commerce
• SonicWall SMA
• Dell ECS
• HPE HP-UX
• Red Hat JBoss Core Services
• Dell PowerProtect Data Domain

Productinfo

Type

• Web Server

Vendor

• Apache

Name

• HTTP Server

Version

• 2.4.0
• 2.4.1
• 2.4.2
• 2.4.3
• 2.4.4
• 2.4.5
• 2.4.6
• 2.4.7
• 2.4.8
• 2.4.9
• 2.4.10
• 2.4.11
• 2.4.12
• 2.4.13
• 2.4.14
• 2.4.15
• 2.4.16
• 2.4.17
• 2.4.18
• 2.4.19
• 2.4.20
• 2.4.21
• 2.4.22
• 2.4.23
• 2.4.24
• 2.4.25
• 2.4.26
• 2.4.27
• 2.4.28
• 2.4.29
• 2.4.30
• 2.4.31
• 2.4.32
• 2.4.33
• 2.4.34
• 2.4.35
• 2.4.36
• 2.4.37
• 2.4.38
• 2.4.39
• 2.4.40
• 2.4.41
• 2.4.42
• 2.4.43
• 2.4.44
• 2.4.45
• 2.4.46
• 2.4.47
• 2.4.48
• 2.4.49
• 2.4.50
• 2.4.51
• 2.4.52
• 2.4.53
• 2.4.54
• 2.4.55
• 2.4.56
• 2.4.57
• 2.4.58

License

• open-source

Website

• Vendor: https://www.apache.org/

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion