| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in X-T9 Plugin on WordPress. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability was named CVE-2024-31386. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in X-T9 Plugin on WordPress (affected version not known). This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hidekazu Ishikawa X-T9, Hidekazu Ishikawa Lightning, themeinwp Default Mag, Out the Box Namaha, Out the Box CityLogic, Marsian i-max, Jetmonsters Emmet Lite, Macho Themes Decode, Wayneconnor Sliding Door, Out the Box Shopstar!, Modernthemesnet Gridsby, TT Themes HappenStance, Marsian i-excel, Out the Box Panoramic, Modernthemesnet Sensible WP.This issue affects X-T9: from n/a through 1.19.0; Lightning: from n/a through 15.18.0; Default Mag: from n/a through 1.3.5; Namaha: from n/a through 1.0.40; CityLogic: from n/a through 1.1.29; i-max: from n/a through 1.6.2; Emmet Lite: from n/a through 1.7.5; Decode: from n/a through 3.15.3; Sliding Door: from n/a through 3.3; Shopstar!: from n/a through 1.1.33; Gridsby: from n/a through 1.3.0; HappenStance: from n/a through 3.0.1; i-excel: from n/a through 1.7.9; Panoramic: from n/a through 1.1.56; Sensible WP: from n/a through 1.3.1.
The weakness was presented by Dhabaleshwar Das. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-31386 since 04/01/2024. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.3
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/01/2024 🔍04/10/2024 🔍
04/10/2024 🔍
04/07/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Dhabaleshwar Das
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-31386 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-31386
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-260283
Entry
Created: 04/10/2024 21:33Updated: 04/07/2025 00:51
Changes: 04/10/2024 21:33 (61), 05/16/2024 11:36 (1), 04/07/2025 00:51 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.