Default Mag Plugin on WordPress cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Default Mag Plugin on WordPress. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2024-31386. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Default Mag Plugin on WordPress (the affected version is unknown) and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hidekazu Ishikawa X-T9, Hidekazu Ishikawa Lightning, themeinwp Default Mag, Out the Box Namaha, Out the Box CityLogic, Marsian i-max, Jetmonsters Emmet Lite, Macho Themes Decode, Wayneconnor Sliding Door, Out the Box Shopstar!, Modernthemesnet Gridsby, TT Themes HappenStance, Marsian i-excel, Out the Box Panoramic, Modernthemesnet Sensible WP.This issue affects X-T9: from n/a through 1.19.0; Lightning: from n/a through 15.18.0; Default Mag: from n/a through 1.3.5; Namaha: from n/a through 1.0.40; CityLogic: from n/a through 1.1.29; i-max: from n/a through 1.6.2; Emmet Lite: from n/a through 1.7.5; Decode: from n/a through 3.15.3; Sliding Door: from n/a through 3.3; Shopstar!: from n/a through 1.1.33; Gridsby: from n/a through 1.3.0; HappenStance: from n/a through 3.0.1; i-excel: from n/a through 1.7.9; Panoramic: from n/a through 1.1.56; Sensible WP: from n/a through 1.3.1.
The weakness was published by Dhabaleshwar Das. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-31386 since 04/01/2024. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.3
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/01/2024 🔍04/10/2024 🔍
04/10/2024 🔍
04/07/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Dhabaleshwar Das
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-31386 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-31386
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-260285
Entry
Created: 04/10/2024 21:33Updated: 04/07/2025 00:26
Changes: 04/10/2024 21:33 (61), 05/16/2024 11:52 (1), 04/07/2025 00:26 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.