Gridsby Plugin on WordPress cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Gridsby Plugin on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2024-31386. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Gridsby Plugin on WordPress (unknown version) and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hidekazu Ishikawa X-T9, Hidekazu Ishikawa Lightning, themeinwp Default Mag, Out the Box Namaha, Out the Box CityLogic, Marsian i-max, Jetmonsters Emmet Lite, Macho Themes Decode, Wayneconnor Sliding Door, Out the Box Shopstar!, Modernthemesnet Gridsby, TT Themes HappenStance, Marsian i-excel, Out the Box Panoramic, Modernthemesnet Sensible WP.This issue affects X-T9: from n/a through 1.19.0; Lightning: from n/a through 15.18.0; Default Mag: from n/a through 1.3.5; Namaha: from n/a through 1.0.40; CityLogic: from n/a through 1.1.29; i-max: from n/a through 1.6.2; Emmet Lite: from n/a through 1.7.5; Decode: from n/a through 3.15.3; Sliding Door: from n/a through 3.3; Shopstar!: from n/a through 1.1.33; Gridsby: from n/a through 1.3.0; HappenStance: from n/a through 3.0.1; i-excel: from n/a through 1.7.9; Panoramic: from n/a through 1.1.56; Sensible WP: from n/a through 1.3.1.
The weakness was presented by Dhabaleshwar Das. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-31386 since 04/01/2024. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.3
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/01/2024 🔍04/10/2024 🔍
04/10/2024 🔍
04/07/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Dhabaleshwar Das
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-31386 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-31386
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-260293
Entry
Created: 04/10/2024 21:33Updated: 04/07/2025 00:00
Changes: 04/10/2024 21:33 (61), 05/16/2024 12:51 (1), 04/07/2025 00:00 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.