Xiongmai AHB7804R-MH-V2 up to 5.00.R02.00030751.10010.348717.0000000 Sofia Service access control
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Xiongmai AHB7804R-MH-V2, AHB8004T-GL, AHB8008T-GL, AHB7004T-GS-V3, AHB7004T-MHV2, AHB8032F-LME and XM530_R80X30-PQ_8M. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Sofia Service. This manipulation with the input ff00000000000000000000000000f103250000007b202252657422203a203130302c202253657373696f6e494422203a202230783022207d0a causes access control.
This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2024-3765. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
It is advisable to implement restrictive firewalling.
The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Xiongmai AHB7804R-MH-V2, AHB8004T-GL, AHB8008T-GL, AHB7004T-GS-V3, AHB7004T-MHV2, AHB8032F-LME and XM530_R80X30-PQ_8M. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the component Sofia Service. The manipulation with the input value ff00000000000000000000000000f103250000007b202252657422203a203130302c202253657373696f6e494422203a202230783022207d0a leads to a access control vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-284. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-3765. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Proper firewalling of 34567 is able to address this issue.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 4.02.R11.24340142.10001.131900.00000
- 4.02.R11.A8531149.10001.131900.00000
- 4.02.R11.C6380171.11201.141900.00000
- 4.03.R11.0000020X.11201.042300.0000005
- 4.03.R11.4912720B.11201.142300.0000004
- 4.03.R11.4912720D.11201.142300.0000004
- 4.03.R11.4915714A.12201.142300.0000000
- 5.00.R02.00030751.10010.348717.0000000
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.2
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector (VulDB): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Firewalling: 🔍
Timeline
04/14/2024 🔍04/14/2024 🔍
04/14/2024 🔍
05/22/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-3765 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-3765
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-260605
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 04/14/2024 10:49Updated: 05/22/2024 14:10
Changes: 04/14/2024 10:49 (57), 04/14/2024 10:50 (1), 05/22/2024 14:09 (2), 05/22/2024 14:10 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: netsecfish
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #311903: Xiongmai AHB7804R-MH-V2, AHB8008T-GL, AHB8004T-GL, XM530_R80X30-PQ_8M, AHB7004T-GS-V3, AHB8032F-LME, AHB7004T-MHV2 V4.03.R11.4915714A.12201.142300.0000000, V4.02.R11.A8531149.10001.131900.00000, V4.03.R11.4912720B.11201.142300.0000004, V4.03.R Incorrect A (by netsecfish)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.