Repute InfoSystems ARForms Plugin up to 6.4 on WordPress cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Repute InfoSystems ARForms Plugin up to 6.4 on WordPress and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2024-32702. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Repute InfoSystems ARForms Plugin up to 6.4 on WordPress. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in reputeinfosystems ARForms arforms.This issue affects ARForms: from n/a through <= 6.4.
The weakness was released by Dave Jong. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-32702 since 04/17/2024. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2024-30489). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.8
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.1
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/17/2024 🔍04/24/2024 🔍
04/24/2024 🔍
04/02/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Dave Jong
Status: Not defined
CNA: Patchstack
CVE: CVE-2024-32702 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-32702
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-261901
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/24/2024 13:01Updated: 04/02/2026 01:49
Changes: 04/24/2024 13:01 (63), 05/29/2024 08:22 (1), 04/04/2025 02:52 (4), 01/22/2026 21:21 (12), 01/23/2026 12:03 (1), 04/02/2026 01:49 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.