Nico Martin Progressive Plugin up to 2.1.13 on WordPress authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Nico Martin Progressive Plugin up to 2.1.13 on WordPress and classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in authorization. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-33937. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Nico Martin Progressive Plugin up to 2.1.13 on WordPress. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-862. The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Nico Martin Progressive WordPress (PWA).This issue affects Progressive WordPress (PWA): from n/a through 2.1.13.
The weakness was published by Abdi Pranata. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-33937 since 04/29/2024. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.3
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: AuthorizationCWE: CWE-862 / CWE-863 / CWE-285
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/29/2024 🔍05/03/2024 🔍
05/03/2024 🔍
05/03/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Abdi Pranata
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-33937 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-33937
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-262965
Entry
Created: 05/03/2024 10:49Changes: 05/03/2024 10:49 (62)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.