Cisco Secure Client on Windows Network Access Manager missing authentication

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Secure Client on Windows. It has been rated as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Network Access Manager. The manipulation leads to missing authentication. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-20391. It is possible to launch the attack on the physical device. There is no exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Secure Client on Windows (Network Encryption Software) (version unknown). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown function of the component Network Access Manager. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing authentication vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-306. The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A vulnerability in the Network Access Manager (NAM) module of Cisco Secure Client could allow an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to an affected device to elevate privileges to SYSTEM. This vulnerability is due to a lack of authentication on a specific function. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on an affected device.
The advisory is shared at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-20391 since 11/08/2023. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 6.8
VulDB Temp Score: 6.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.8
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Missing authenticationCWE: CWE-306 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Yes
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/08/2023 🔍05/15/2024 🔍
05/15/2024 🔍
07/23/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: cisco-sa-secure-nam-priv-esc-szu2vYpZ
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2024-20391 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-20391
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-264509
Entry
Created: 05/15/2024 19:21Updated: 07/23/2025 00:01
Changes: 05/15/2024 19:21 (52), 05/16/2024 10:43 (3), 07/23/2025 00:01 (13)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
I found this description into NVD NIST:
"A vulnerability in the Network Access Manager (NAM) module of Cisco Secure Client could allow an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to an affected device to elevate privileges to SYSTEM. This vulnerability is due to a lack of authentication on a specific function. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on an affected device."
Why do you assert that the vulnerability was found in Oracle Access Manager?
Best Regards,
TEAM CERT
Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?
Check our Alexa App!