Realtek lO Driver 1.008.0823.2017 IOCTL Request rtkio64.sys privilege escalation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.8$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Realtek lO Driver 1.008.0823.2017. Impacted is an unknown function in the library rtkio64.sys of the component IOCTL Request Handler. Performing a manipulation results in an unknown weakness. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2024-33224. There is not any exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Realtek lO Driver 1.008.0823.2017. This affects an unknown code in the library rtkio64.sys of the component IOCTL Request Handler. The impact remains unknown. The summary by CVE is:

An issue in the component rtkio64.sys of Realtek Semiconductor Corp Realtek lO Driver v1.008.0823.2017 allows attackers to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code via sending crafted IOCTL requests.

The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-33224 since 04/23/2024. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.9
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.8

VulDB Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 8.4
CNA Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Privilege escalation
CWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Partially

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

04/23/2024 🔍
05/22/2024 +29 days 🔍
05/22/2024 +0 days 🔍
08/25/2024 +95 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: github.com
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2024-33224 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-33224
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-265941

Entryinfo

Created: 05/22/2024 18:46
Updated: 08/25/2024 17:45
Changes: 05/22/2024 18:46 (52), 08/25/2024 17:45 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Want to know what is going to be exploited?

We predict KEV entries!