Nathan Neulinger CGIwrap up to 3.24 Remote Code Execution
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as very critical has been detected in Nathan Neulinger CGIwrap. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in Remote Code Execution. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-3254. No exploit is available. You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as very critical has been found in Nathan Neulinger CGIwrap. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a remote code execution vulnerability. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The CGIwrap program before 3.9 on Debian GNU/Linux uses an incorrect minimum value of 100 for a UID to determine whether it can perform a seteuid operation, which could allow attackers to execute code as other system UIDs that are greater than the minimum value, which should be 1000 on Debian systems.
The weakness was published 10/18/2005 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at lists.alioth.debian.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2005-3254 since 10/18/2005. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/12/2018).
Upgrading to version 3.9 eliminates this vulnerability.
Similar entry is available at VDB-26596. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.4
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Remote Code ExecutionCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: CGIwrap 3.9
Timeline
10/18/2005 🔍10/18/2005 🔍
10/18/2005 🔍
03/11/2015 🔍
07/12/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: lists.alioth.debian.orgStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2005-3254 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-3254
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-26595
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/11/2015 23:39Updated: 07/12/2018 08:35
Changes: 03/11/2015 23:39 (40), 07/12/2018 08:35 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:BDC:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.