Repute InfoSystems ARForms Plugin up to 6.4 on WordPress authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Repute InfoSystems ARForms Plugin up to 6.4 on WordPress. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation leads to authorization. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2024-32703. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Repute InfoSystems ARForms Plugin up to 6.4 on WordPress. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-862. The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in reputeinfosystems ARForms arforms.This issue affects ARForms: from n/a through <= 6.4.
The weakness was published by Dave Jong. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-32703 since 04/17/2024. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.7
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.7
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: AuthorizationCWE: CWE-862 / CWE-863 / CWE-285
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/17/2024 🔍06/09/2024 🔍
06/09/2024 🔍
04/02/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Dave Jong
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-32703 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-32703
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-267605
Entry
Created: 06/09/2024 21:21Updated: 04/02/2026 05:51
Changes: 06/09/2024 21:21 (63), 09/26/2024 04:03 (13), 04/02/2026 05:51 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.