Ruijie RG-UAC 1.0 commit.php ad_log_name os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Ruijie RG-UAC 1.0. It has been rated as critical. This impacts an unknown function of the file /view/userAuthentication/SSO/commit.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument ad_log_name results in os command injection. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2024-6186. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Ruijie RG-UAC 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /view/userAuthentication/SSO/commit.php. The manipulation of the argument ad_log_name with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-6186. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Technical details and a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
The exploit is shared for download at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. By approaching the search of inurl:view/userAuthentication/SSO/commit.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔍
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.3
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/20/2024 🔍06/20/2024 🔍
08/21/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-6186 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-6186
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-269157
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 06/20/2024 07:33Updated: 08/21/2025 03:48
Changes: 06/20/2024 07:33 (56), 06/21/2024 15:53 (19), 08/21/2025 03:48 (24)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: N3xu5Cr4ck37
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #354122: Ruijie Network RG-UAC 1.0 online behavior management (by N3xu5Cr4ck37)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.