| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Geehy APM32F103CCT6, APM32F103RCT6, APM32F103RCT7 and APM32F103VCT6 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to access control. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-21739. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Geehy APM32F103CCT6, APM32F103RCT6, APM32F103RCT7 and APM32F103VCT6 (the affected version unknown) and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-284. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Geehy APM32F103CCT6, APM32F103RCT6, APM32F103RCT7, and APM32F103VCT6 devices have Incorrect Access Control.
It is possible to read the advisory at tches.iacr.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-21739 since 01/02/2024. The exploitation is known to be easy. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1068 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.3
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/02/2024 🔍06/25/2024 🔍
06/25/2024 🔍
11/08/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: tches.iacr.orgStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-21739 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-21739
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-269699
Entry
Created: 06/25/2024 23:10Updated: 11/08/2024 04:07
Changes: 06/25/2024 23:10 (50), 06/27/2024 11:36 (1), 11/08/2024 04:07 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.