Samsung Devices up to SMR Feb-2021 Release 1 IMS Service SoftphoneClient implicit intent

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.2$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Samsung Devices. It has been rated as problematic. The affected element is the function SoftphoneClient of the component IMS Service. The manipulation leads to implicit intent. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2024-20898. The attack needs to be performed locally. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Samsung Devices and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function SoftphoneClient of the component IMS Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a implicit intent vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-927. The Android application uses an implicit intent for transmitting sensitive data to other applications. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:

Use of implicit intent for sensitive communication in SoftphoneClient in IMS service prior to SMR Jul-2024 Release 1 allows local attackers to get sensitive information.

The advisory is shared at security.samsungmobile.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-20898 since 12/05/2023. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.

Upgrading to version SMR Jul-2024 Release 1 eliminates this vulnerability.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2

VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 4.0
CNA Vector (Samsung Mobile): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Implicit intent
CWE: CWE-927
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: Devices SMR Jul-2024 Release 1

Timelineinfo

12/05/2023 🔍
07/02/2024 +209 days 🔍
07/02/2024 +0 days 🔍
07/06/2024 +4 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: samsung.com

Advisory: security.samsungmobile.com
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2024-20898 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-20898
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-270221

Entryinfo

Created: 07/02/2024 14:00
Updated: 07/06/2024 04:35
Changes: 07/02/2024 14:00 (64), 07/06/2024 04:35 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!