LevelOne WBR-6013 RER4_A_v3411b_2T2R_LEV_09_170623 Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK formWsc localPin os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in LevelOne WBR-6013 RER4_A_v3411b_2T2R_LEV_09_170623. This vulnerability affects the function formWsc of the component Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK. This manipulation of the argument localPin causes os command injection.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2023-50383. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in LevelOne WBR-6013 RER4_A_v3411b_2T2R_LEV_09_170623. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formWsc of the component Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK. The manipulation of the argument localPin with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Three os command injection vulnerabilities exist in the boa formWsc functionality of Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK v3.4.11. A specially crafted series of HTTP requests can lead to arbitrary command execution. An attacker can send a series of HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This command injection is related to the `localPin` request's parameter.
The advisory is shared at talosintelligence.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-50383 since 12/07/2023. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are necessary for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/12/2024). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.2
VulDB Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.2
CNA Vector (talos): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/07/2023 🔍07/08/2024 🔍
07/08/2024 🔍
07/12/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: TALOS-2023-1899Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-50383 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-50383
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-270493
Entry
Created: 07/08/2024 17:50Updated: 07/12/2024 04:21
Changes: 07/08/2024 17:50 (65), 07/12/2024 04:21 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.