| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Quicksilver Forums up to 1.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Agent. Performing a manipulation results in sql injection. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2005-4030. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Quicksilver Forums up to 1.5.0 (Forum Software). This affects some unknown functionality of the component Agent. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
SQL injection vulnerability in Quicksilver Forums before 1.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the HTTP_USER_AGENT header.
The weakness was shared 12/04/2005 (Website). The advisory is shared at sourceforge.net. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2005-4030 since 12/06/2005. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1505 for this issue.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading to version 1.5.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (23414), SecurityFocus (BID 15710†), OSVDB (21443†) and Secunia (SA17861†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Quicksilver Forums 1.5.1
Timeline
12/04/2005 🔍12/05/2005 🔍
12/05/2005 🔍
12/05/2005 🔍
12/06/2005 🔍
12/06/2005 🔍
03/11/2015 🔍
07/28/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: sourceforge.netStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2005-4030 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-4030
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-27309
X-Force: 23414
SecurityFocus: 15710 - Quicksilver Forums SQL Injection Vulnerability
Secunia: 17861 - Quicksilver Forums HTTP_USER_AGENT SQL Injection Vulnerability, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 21443 - Quicksilver Forums HTTP_USER_AGENT SQL Injection
Vupen: ADV-2005-2729
Entry
Created: 03/11/2015 23:39Updated: 07/28/2017 10:35
Changes: 03/11/2015 23:39 (60), 07/28/2017 10:35 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.