Web4Future KeyWord Frequency Counter 1.0 index.cgi cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Web4Future KeyWord Frequency Counter 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file index.cgi. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-4036. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Web4Future KeyWord Frequency Counter 1.0. This affects an unknown functionality of the file index.cgi. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.cgi in Web4Future KeyWord Frequency Counter 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "remote URL."
The weakness was published 12/06/2005 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at vupen.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2005-4036 since 12/06/2005. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 15702†) and Secunia (SA17876†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/05/2005 🔍12/06/2005 🔍
12/06/2005 🔍
12/06/2005 🔍
12/06/2005 🔍
03/11/2015 🔍
07/27/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2005-4036 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-4036
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-27315
SecurityFocus: 15702 - Web4Future KeyWord Frequency Counter Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
Secunia: 17876 - KeyWord Frequency Counter "url" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability, Less Critical
Vupen: ADV-2005-2743
Entry
Created: 03/11/2015 23:39Updated: 07/27/2017 08:52
Changes: 03/11/2015 23:39 (48), 07/27/2017 08:52 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.