| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in Ricoh JavaTM Platform up to 12.89. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component TLS Handler. Such manipulation leads to initialization. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2024-41995. The attack may be performed from remote. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Ricoh JavaTM Platform up to 12.89. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is an unknown code block of the component TLS Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a initialization vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-665. The product does not initialize or incorrectly initializes a resource, which might leave the resource in an unexpected state when it is accessed or used. The impact remains unknown. CVE summarizes:
Initialization of a resource with an insecure default vulnerability exists in JavaTM Platform Ver.12.89 and earlier. If this vulnerability is exploited, the product may be affected by some known TLS1.0 and TLS1.1 vulnerabilities. As for the specific products/models/versions of MFPs and printers that contain JavaTM Platform, see the information provided by the vendor.
The advisory is available at ricoh.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2024-41995 since 07/26/2024. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The attack may be launched remotely. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 12.0
- 12.1
- 12.2
- 12.3
- 12.4
- 12.5
- 12.6
- 12.7
- 12.8
- 12.9
- 12.10
- 12.11
- 12.12
- 12.13
- 12.14
- 12.15
- 12.16
- 12.17
- 12.18
- 12.19
- 12.20
- 12.21
- 12.22
- 12.23
- 12.24
- 12.25
- 12.26
- 12.27
- 12.28
- 12.29
- 12.30
- 12.31
- 12.32
- 12.33
- 12.34
- 12.35
- 12.36
- 12.37
- 12.38
- 12.39
- 12.40
- 12.41
- 12.42
- 12.43
- 12.44
- 12.45
- 12.46
- 12.47
- 12.48
- 12.49
- 12.50
- 12.51
- 12.52
- 12.53
- 12.54
- 12.55
- 12.56
- 12.57
- 12.58
- 12.59
- 12.60
- 12.61
- 12.62
- 12.63
- 12.64
- 12.65
- 12.66
- 12.67
- 12.68
- 12.69
- 12.70
- 12.71
- 12.72
- 12.73
- 12.74
- 12.75
- 12.76
- 12.77
- 12.78
- 12.79
- 12.80
- 12.81
- 12.82
- 12.83
- 12.84
- 12.85
- 12.86
- 12.87
- 12.88
- 12.89
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.0
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: InitializationCWE: CWE-665
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/26/2024 🔍08/06/2024 🔍
08/06/2024 🔍
03/24/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: ricoh-2024-000010Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-41995 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-41995
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-273698
Entry
Created: 08/06/2024 09:50Updated: 03/24/2025 21:27
Changes: 08/06/2024 09:50 (53), 08/06/2024 09:52 (1), 03/24/2025 21:27 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.