Focalmedia.net SiteNet BBS up to 2.0 netboardr.cgi cid cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Focalmedia.net SiteNet BBS up to 2.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file netboardr.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument cid results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-4306. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Focalmedia.net SiteNet BBS up to 2.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file netboardr.cgi. The manipulation of the argument cid with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in SiteNet BBS 2.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) pg, (2) tid, (3) cid, and (4) fid parameters to netboardr.cgi, or (5) cid parameter to search.cgi.
The weakness was published 12/16/2005 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at vupen.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2005-4306 since 12/16/2005. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (26842), SecurityFocus (BID 15883†) and Secunia (SA18090†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/15/2005 🔍12/16/2005 🔍
12/16/2005 🔍
12/16/2005 🔍
12/16/2005 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
11/26/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2005-4306 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-4306
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-27555
SecurityFocus: 15883 - SiteNet BBS Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
Secunia: 18090 - SiteNet BBS Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities, Less Critical
Vupen: ADV-2005-2939
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 11:11Updated: 11/26/2024 02:42
Changes: 03/12/2015 11:11 (49), 08/04/2017 08:37 (7), 11/26/2024 02:42 (24)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.