Progress LoadMaster up to 7.2.60.0 os command injection

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Progress LoadMaster up to 7.2.60.0. This affects an unknown function. This manipulation causes os command injection. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2024-6658. The attack requires access to the local network. No exploit is available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Progress LoadMaster up to 7.2.60.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Improper Input Validation vulnerability of Authenticated User in Progress LoadMaster allows OS Command Injection.This issue affects:  Product Affected Versions LoadMaster From 7.2.55.0 to 7.2.60.0 (inclusive)    From 7.2.49.0 to 7.2.54.11 (inclusive)    7.2.48.12 and all prior versions Multi-Tenant Hypervisor 7.1.35.11 and all prior versions ECS All prior versions to 7.2.60.0 (inclusive)

The weakness was published by Huydoppa. The advisory is shared at support.kemptechnologies.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-6658 since 07/10/2024. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can only be done within the local network. The exploitation requires an enhanced level of successful authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.

Upgrading to version 7.2.60.1 eliminates this vulnerability.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

• Progress

Name

• LoadMaster

Version

• 7.2.0
• 7.2.1
• 7.2.2
• 7.2.3
• 7.2.4
• 7.2.5
• 7.2.6
• 7.2.7
• 7.2.8
• 7.2.9
• 7.2.10
• 7.2.11
• 7.2.12
• 7.2.13
• 7.2.14
• 7.2.15
• 7.2.16
• 7.2.17
• 7.2.18
• 7.2.19
• 7.2.20
• 7.2.21
• 7.2.22
• 7.2.23
• 7.2.24
• 7.2.25
• 7.2.26
• 7.2.27
• 7.2.28
• 7.2.29
• 7.2.30
• 7.2.31
• 7.2.32
• 7.2.33
• 7.2.34
• 7.2.35
• 7.2.36
• 7.2.37
• 7.2.38
• 7.2.39
• 7.2.40
• 7.2.41
• 7.2.42
• 7.2.43
• 7.2.44
• 7.2.45
• 7.2.46
• 7.2.47
• 7.2.48
• 7.2.49
• 7.2.50
• 7.2.51
• 7.2.52
• 7.2.53
• 7.2.54
• 7.2.55
• 7.2.56
• 7.2.57
• 7.2.58
• 7.2.59
• 7.2.60.0

License

• commercial

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion