D-Link DNS-320/DNS-320LW/DNS-325/DNS-340L up to 20241028 account_mgr.cgi?cmd=cgi_user_add Name os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DNS-320, DNS-320LW, DNS-325 and DNS-340L up to 20241028. It has been classified as critical. This issue affects the function cgi_user_add of the file /cgi-bin/account_mgr.cgi?cmd=cgi_user_add. This manipulation of the argument Name causes os command injection.
The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-10914. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
It is advisable to implement restrictive firewalling.
Details
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DNS-320, DNS-320LW, DNS-325 and DNS-340L up to 20241028. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function cgi_user_add of the file /cgi-bin/account_mgr.cgi?cmd=cgi_user_add. The manipulation of the argument name with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The advisory is shared at netsecfish.notion.site. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-10914. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at netsecfish.notion.site. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Proper firewalling of is able to address this issue.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔍
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.3
VulDB Base Score: 8.1
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.1
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/06/2024 🔍11/06/2024 🔍
11/24/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: netsecfish.notion.site
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-10914 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-10914
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-283309
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 11/06/2024 08:13Updated: 11/24/2024 16:47
Changes: 11/06/2024 08:13 (57), 11/24/2024 16:47 (41)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: netsecfish
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #432847: D-Link DNS-320, DNS-320LW, DNS-325, DNS-340L Version 1.00, Version 1.01.0914.2012, Version 1.01, Version 1.02, Version 1.08 Command Injection (by netsecfish)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.