realmag777 Active Products Tables for WooCommerce Plugin up to 1.0.6.4 on WordPress Shortcode woot_button cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in realmag777 Active Products Tables for WooCommerce Plugin up to 1.0.6.4 on WordPress. Affected by this issue is the function woot_button of the component Shortcode Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting.
This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2024-10168. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in realmag777 Active Products Tables for WooCommerce Plugin up to 1.0.6.4 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function woot_button of the component Shortcode Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The Active Products Tables for WooCommerce. Use constructor to create tables plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's woot_button shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
The weakness was disclosed by Peter Thaleikis. The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-10168 since 10/18/2024. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.4
CNA Vector (Wordfence): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/18/2024 🔍11/06/2024 🔍
11/06/2024 🔍
03/01/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comResearcher: Peter Thaleikis
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-10168 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-10168
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-283317
Entry
Created: 11/06/2024 15:38Updated: 03/01/2025 15:55
Changes: 11/06/2024 15:38 (66), 03/01/2025 15:55 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:D1C:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.