code-projects Farmacia 1.0 usuario.php Name cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in code-projects Farmacia 1.0 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file usuario.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument Name results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2024-11660. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists. Other parameters might be affected as well.
Details
A vulnerability was found in code-projects Farmacia 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file usuario.php. The manipulation of the argument name with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-11660. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The exploit is shared for download at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. Other parameters might be affected as well. By approaching the search of inurl:usuario.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://code-projects.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔍
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Researcher Base Score: 10.0
Researcher Vector: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.5
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Researcher Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/24/2024 🔍11/24/2024 🔍
02/23/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: code-projects.orgAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-11660 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-11660
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-285981
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 11/24/2024 16:22Updated: 02/23/2025 10:20
Changes: 11/24/2024 16:22 (57), 11/25/2024 07:21 (20), 11/25/2024 07:24 (4), 12/04/2024 23:18 (41), 02/23/2025 10:20 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: Eevo
Committer: Eevo
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #446925: code-projects farmacia-in-php v1.0 Cross Site Scripting (by Eevo)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.