CleanTalk Spam protection, Anti-Spam, Firewall Plugin up to 6.43.2 on WordPress Plugin Installation authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CleanTalk Spam protection, Anti-Spam, Firewall Plugin up to 6.43.2 on WordPress. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Plugin Installation Handler. Performing a manipulation results in authorization. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2024-10542. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CleanTalk Spam protection, Anti-Spam, Firewall Plugin up to 6.43.2 on WordPress. This affects some unknown processing of the component Plugin Installation Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-639. The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The Spam protection, Anti-Spam, FireWall by CleanTalk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized Arbitrary Plugin Installation due to an authorization bypass via reverse DNS spoofing on the checkWithoutToken function in all versions up to, and including, 6.43.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to install and activate arbitrary plugins which can be leveraged to achieve remote code execution if another vulnerable plugin is installed and activated.
It is possible to read the advisory at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-10542 since 10/30/2024. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/12/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: AuthorizationCWE: CWE-639 / CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/30/2024 🔍11/25/2024 🔍
11/25/2024 🔍
07/12/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-10542 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-10542
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-286047
Entry
Created: 11/25/2024 21:25Updated: 07/12/2025 09:49
Changes: 11/25/2024 21:25 (52), 07/12/2025 09:49 (22)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.