Erik C. Thauvin mailback mailback.pl

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.1$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability categorized as problematic has been discovered in Erik C. Thauvin mailback. This affects an unknown function of the file mailback.pl. Such manipulation leads to an unknown weakness. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2006-0631. No exploit exists.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Erik C. Thauvin mailback (affected version unknown) and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is an unknown functionality of the file mailback.pl. Impacted is integrity. CVE summarizes:

CRLF injection vulnerability in mailback.pl in Erik C. Thauvin mailback allows remote attackers to use mailback as a "spam proxy" by modifying mail headers, including recipient e-mail addresses, via newline characters in the Subject field.

The weakness was disclosed 02/05/2006 by coderpunk (Website). The advisory is shared for download at seclists.org. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2006-0631 since 02/10/2006. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be launched remotely. No form of authentication is required for exploitation. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available.

It is declared as highly functional.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (24540), OSVDB (22955†) and Secunia (SA18748†). Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1

VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Unknown
CWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

02/05/2006 🔍
02/07/2006 +1 days 🔍
02/09/2006 +2 days 🔍
02/10/2006 +0 days 🔍
02/10/2006 +0 days 🔍
03/12/2015 +3317 days 🔍
08/04/2017 +876 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: seclists.org
Researcher: coderpunk
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2006-0631 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-0631
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-28652
X-Force: 24540 - Mailback mailback.pl \
Secunia: 18748 - Mailback Mail Header Injection Vulnerability, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 22955 - Erik Thauvin mailback.pl Subject Line Arbitrary Mail Relay
Vupen: ADV-2006-0459

Entryinfo

Created: 03/12/2015 11:11
Updated: 08/04/2017 08:34
Changes: 03/12/2015 11:11 (48), 08/04/2017 08:34 (8)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!