VMware Spring LDAP up to 2.4.3/3.0.9/3.1.7/3.2.7 String.toLowerCase/String.toUpperCase case sensitivity
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in VMware Spring LDAP up to 2.4.3/3.0.9/3.1.7/3.2.7. The affected element is the function String.toLowerCase/String.toUpperCase. Performing a manipulation results in case sensitivity.
This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2024-38829. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in VMware Spring LDAP up to 2.4.3/3.0.9/3.1.7/3.2.7. This affects the function String.toLowerCase/String.toUpperCase. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a case sensitivity vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-178. The product does not properly account for differences in case sensitivity when accessing or determining the properties of a resource, leading to inconsistent results. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
A vulnerability in VMware Tanzu Spring LDAP allows data exposure for case sensitive comparisons.This issue affects Spring LDAP: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.3, from 3.0.0 through 3.0.9, from 3.1.0 through 3.1.7, from 3.2.0 through 3.2.7, AND all versions prior to 2.4.0. The usage of String.toLowerCase() and String.toUpperCase() has some Locale dependent exceptions that could potentially result in unintended columns from being queried Related to CVE-2024-38820 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-38820
The advisory is shared at spring.io. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-38829 since 06/20/2024. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
Upgrading to version 2.4.4, 3.0.10, 3.1.8 or 3.2.8 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 2.4.0
- 2.4.1
- 2.4.2
- 2.4.3
- 3.0.0
- 3.0.1
- 3.0.2
- 3.0.3
- 3.0.4
- 3.0.5
- 3.0.6
- 3.0.7
- 3.0.8
- 3.0.9
- 3.1.0
- 3.1.1
- 3.1.2
- 3.1.3
- 3.1.4
- 3.1.5
- 3.1.6
- 3.1.7
- 3.2.0
- 3.2.1
- 3.2.2
- 3.2.3
- 3.2.4
- 3.2.5
- 3.2.6
- 3.2.7
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.vmware.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.7
CNA Vector (vmware): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Case sensitivityCWE: CWE-178 / CWE-697
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Spring LDAP 2.4.4/3.0.10/3.1.8/3.2.8
Timeline
06/20/2024 🔍12/05/2024 🔍
12/05/2024 🔍
12/05/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: vmware.comAdvisory: spring.io
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2024-38829 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-38829
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-286941
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20060413
Entry
Created: 12/05/2024 07:07Changes: 12/05/2024 07:07 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.