Avenwu Whistle up to 2.9.90 cross-site request forgery

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Avenwu Whistle up to 2.9.90. This impacts an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-55500. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Avenwu Whistle up to 2.9.90. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avenwu Whistle v.2.9.90 and before allows attackers to perform malicious API calls, resulting in the execution of arbitrary code on the victim's machine.

It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-55500 since 12/06/2024. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.

Applying the patch d1b8ca275dc4e453bd2efed392c0fd4b92f73cdf is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2024-3470). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

• Avenwu

Name

• Whistle

Version

• 2.9.0
• 2.9.1
• 2.9.2
• 2.9.3
• 2.9.4
• 2.9.5
• 2.9.6
• 2.9.7
• 2.9.8
• 2.9.9
• 2.9.10
• 2.9.11
• 2.9.12
• 2.9.13
• 2.9.14
• 2.9.15
• 2.9.16
• 2.9.17
• 2.9.18
• 2.9.19
• 2.9.20
• 2.9.21
• 2.9.22
• 2.9.23
• 2.9.24
• 2.9.25
• 2.9.26
• 2.9.27
• 2.9.28
• 2.9.29
• 2.9.30
• 2.9.31
• 2.9.32
• 2.9.33
• 2.9.34
• 2.9.35
• 2.9.36
• 2.9.37
• 2.9.38
• 2.9.39
• 2.9.40
• 2.9.41
• 2.9.42
• 2.9.43
• 2.9.44
• 2.9.45
• 2.9.46
• 2.9.47
• 2.9.48
• 2.9.49
• 2.9.50
• 2.9.51
• 2.9.52
• 2.9.53
• 2.9.54
• 2.9.55
• 2.9.56
• 2.9.57
• 2.9.58
• 2.9.59
• 2.9.60
• 2.9.61
• 2.9.62
• 2.9.63
• 2.9.64
• 2.9.65
• 2.9.66
• 2.9.67
• 2.9.68
• 2.9.69
• 2.9.70
• 2.9.71
• 2.9.72
• 2.9.73
• 2.9.74
• 2.9.75
• 2.9.76
• 2.9.77
• 2.9.78
• 2.9.79
• 2.9.80
• 2.9.81
• 2.9.82
• 2.9.83
• 2.9.84
• 2.9.85
• 2.9.86
• 2.9.87
• 2.9.88
• 2.9.89
• 2.9.90

License

• open-source

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion