Abdul Hakeem Build App Online Plugin up to 1.0.23 on WordPress Include/Require filename control
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Abdul Hakeem Build App Online Plugin up to 1.0.23 on WordPress and classified as very critical. The affected element is the function Include/Require. This manipulation causes filename control.
This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2024-49649. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Abdul Hakeem Build App Online Plugin up to 1.0.23 on WordPress and classified as very critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Include/Require. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a filename control vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-98. The PHP application receives input from an upstream component, but it does not restrict or incorrectly restricts the input before its usage in "require," "include," or similar functions. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in Abdul Hakeem Build App Online allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Build App Online: from n/a through 1.0.23.
The weakness was released by Dimas Maulana. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-49649 since 10/17/2024. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/05/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 1.0.0
- 1.0.1
- 1.0.2
- 1.0.3
- 1.0.4
- 1.0.5
- 1.0.6
- 1.0.7
- 1.0.8
- 1.0.9
- 1.0.10
- 1.0.11
- 1.0.12
- 1.0.13
- 1.0.14
- 1.0.15
- 1.0.16
- 1.0.17
- 1.0.18
- 1.0.19
- 1.0.20
- 1.0.21
- 1.0.22
- 1.0.23
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.7
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Filename controlCWE: CWE-98
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/17/2024 🔍01/07/2025 🔍
01/07/2025 🔍
02/05/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Dimas Maulana
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-49649 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-49649
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-290461
Entry
Created: 01/07/2025 13:48Updated: 02/05/2025 15:39
Changes: 01/07/2025 13:48 (21), 01/07/2025 13:51 (34), 02/05/2025 15:39 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Committer: sany
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.