PenguinArts Contact Form 7 Database Plugin up to 1.0.0 on WordPress sql injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in PenguinArts Contact Form 7 Database Plugin up to 1.0.0 on WordPress. This affects an unknown part. Performing a manipulation results in sql injection. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-22351. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in PenguinArts Contact Form 7 Database Plugin up to 1.0.0 on WordPress. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in PenguinArts Contact Form 7 Database – CFDB7 allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Contact Form 7 Database – CFDB7: from n/a through 1.0.0.
The weakness was presented by João Pedro S Alcântara. It is possible to read the advisory at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-22351 since 01/03/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are necessary for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1505 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.7
VulDB Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.6
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/03/2025 🔍01/07/2025 🔍
01/07/2025 🔍
01/07/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: João Pedro S Alcântara
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-22351 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-22351
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-290523
Entry
Created: 01/07/2025 14:49Changes: 01/07/2025 14:49 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.